Purpose: Communication skills (CS) of each doctor vary as individual approach is unique. Assessment of particular skills they apply and what they lack in, permits us to individualize CS training i.e.dentist speciﬁc communication skill (DSCS). This study was designed to assess individual prosthodontic resident’s skills while treating real patients and to subsequently plan individualized coaching to strengthen the deficiencies identified. Methods: Videorecordings were done during treatment for 50 complete denture patients treated by six prosthodontic residents in a dental institution. The videointeractions were analyzed to identify their individual strengths and weakness and an individualized coaching was planned .Post training the residents were observed while treating another set of 50 edentulous patients. Results: It was found that each resident had an ‘individual pattern’ (IP) in practicing some skills as showing care and concern, empathy etc and were lacking in certain other skills e.g. consideration of psychosocial aspects etc. Conclusion: Individual feedback and personalized coaching were very well appreciated by the prosthodontic residents and a change in their attitude and patient-centered approach were apparent.
Wener M, Schonwetter D, Mazurat N. Developing New Dental Communication Skills Assessment Tools by Including Patients and Other Stakeholders. J Dent Educ 2011; 75(12):1527-41.
Murthy V, Sethuraman KR, Choudhury S, Shakila P. Developing Prosthodontic Residents’ Communication Strategies with Edentulous Patients: A Pilot Study . J Dent Educ 2017; 81: 1351-61
Marchini L. Patients’ satisfaction with complete dentures: an update. Braz Dent Sci 2014; 17:5-16.
Shigli K, Awinashe V. Patient-dentist communication: an adjunct to successful complete denture treatment. J Prosthodont 2010; 19:491-3.
Hiler C. Psychological consultation in dental training. J Psychother Independent Pract 2001: 2: 91–104.
van den Eertwegh , van der Vleuten C, Stalmeijer R, van Dalen J, Scherpbier A, van Dulmen S. Exploring residents’ communication learning process in the workplace: A ﬁve-phase model. PLoSONE. 2015; 10:e0125958.
Essers G, van Dulmen S, van Weel C, van der Vleuten C, Kramer A. Identifying context factors explaining physician’s low performance in communication assessment: An explorative study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2011; 12:138.
Essers G, Dielissen P, van Weel C, van der Vleuten C, van Dulmen S, Kramer A. How do trained raters take context factors into account when assessing GP trainee communication performance? An exploratory, qualitative study. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015; 20:131–47.
Carey JA, Madill A and Manogue M.Communications skills in dental education: a systematic research review. Eur J Dent Educ 2010; 14:69–78
Teal CR, Street RL. Critical elements of culturally competent communication in the medical encounter: A review and model. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68:533–43
Saha S, Beach MC, Cooper LA. Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality. J Natl Med Assoc 2008; 100:1275-85.
Sethuraman K R. Communication skills in clinical practice (Doctor patient communication).India: 1st ed. India: Jaypee Medical Publishers P Ltd; 2001.
Sethuraman K R. Communication skills in clinical practice (Doctor patient communication).India: 2nd ed. India: Jaypee Medical Publishers P Ltd; 2016.
Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med.2000; 51:1087–110.
Ball JW, Dains JE, Flynn JA, Solomon BS, Stewart RW. Cultural competency. In: Mosby, editor. Seidel’s guide to physical examination, 8th edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2014. pp. 21–9.
Gillis AE, Morris MC, Ridgway PF.Communication Skills Assessment in the Final Postgraduate Years to Established Practice-A Systematic Review.Postgrad Med J 2015;91:13-21
Reeve J, Tseng M. Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemp Educ Psychol 2011; 36:257–67
Winstone NE, Nash RA, Parker M, Rowntree J. Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educ Psychol 2017; 52: 17-37
Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assess Eval in High Educ 2013b, 38, 698–712
Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, LingardL.TheAccreditations Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Med Educ. 2012; 46:192–200
Paternotte E, Scheele F, Seeleman CM, Bank L, Scherpbier AJJA, van Dulmen S. Intercultural doctor-patient communication in daily outpatient care: relevant communication skills. Perspect Med Educ 2016; 5:268–75.
Gleaves A, Walker C. Richness, redundancy or relational salience? A comparison of the effect of textual and aural feedback modes on knowledge elaboration in higher education students’ work. Comp & Educ 2013; 62: 249–61
O’Loughlin J, Ni Chroinin D, O’Grady D. (2013). Digital video: The impact on children’s learning experiences in primary physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev2013; 19: 165–82.
Schopper H, Rosenbaum M, Axelson R. ‘I wish someone watched me interview:’ medical student insight into observation and feedback as a method for teaching communication skills during the clinical years. BMC Med Educ 2016; 16:286
Napier AD, Ancarno C, Butler B, et al. Culture and health. Lancet 2014; 384:1607–39.